Memveri vs the field
Memveri isn't another coding agent. It's the memory, code-intelligence, and safety layer that works on top of the agent you already use. Here's how the pieces compare, fact by fact.
Measured on our own codebase — 1.3.1 scale on D:\
Real numbers from tests/test_scale_benchmarks.py on D:\ (Windows 11, 1.3.1 ponytail build, MEMVERI_BACKUP=0, Hash provider). Voyage lifts recall further (see below). Synthetic micro-benches kept for reference.
Indexing throughput
Synthetic tree, full build.
50k memories
Threshold <180s for 50k, vectorized normed@normed.T vs O(N²) loop. D: free 354GB.
Real repo — 1.3.1
Full build 40.9s (was 38.7s) — single COUNT + single SELECT for communities; 100× get_neighbors 0.0s (cache).
Recall accuracy — voyage lifts
4-query bench (auth/db topics). VOYAGE_API_KEY auto-picks voyage; COHERE_API_KEY reranks limit*2 after RRF.
The other tools are excellent agents. None of them give you a persistent, tool-agnostic memory with a guardrail ledger and a code knowledge graph.
Add Memveri on top of the one you already use — and keep it.
Download for WindowsHow we scored this comparison
Feature matrix reflects public documentation as of July 2026. "Partial" means the capability exists in a limited form — e.g. Claude Code's memory is guidance loaded into context, not an enforced, searchable store (per Anthropic's own docs), and MiMo Code's memory is SQLite full-text search, not semantic recall.